THE
MOST SCIENTIFIC OF THE HUMANITIES – We are one Species
Anthropology, the study of Anthrop or Man, is a subject that has
dominated human thought for millennia. Prior to the scientific revolution, the
study of man, as an intellectual discipline, has been the province of
philosophy and religion. As a practical
discipline, anthropology was found in the study of history and governance that
have focused on what we might call, “proto-anthropology”
Proto-anthropology is based upon
human observations and practical experience as these related to the daily life
and survival of human groups, aka social units. Early humankind was aware that,
individually and collectively, humans are both similar to and different from
one another. The more intense the individual and collective experience, the
greater these similarities and difference were experienced as the existential
reality. The less intense and/or less frequent the experience, they were more
likely conceived ideationally and envisioned in local myths and belief systems.
Joseph Campbell, in the Hero of a Thousand Faces, is, probably,
the most well known of anthropologist/folklorist. With the help of Bill Moyers, Campbell’s observations and analysis were popularized on PBS TV series in the
1980s "The Power of Myth." Campbell documented
the universality of the human themes that he found in his study of myth and folklore.
Using the comparative method, he found that these folktales and stories reflect
humanity’s ideals for life and their fears about the uncertainties of the
universe. Over time, these themes appear to morph into new forms as a society’s
socio-economic structure developed increasing complexity over time. These
ideational structures also varied with humankind’s relationship to its
ecological universe. One may conclude that the ideational domain of culture developed and evolved along with the
organic development of humankind’s existential experience.
These myths and folklore are
“ideational” representations of a world that is a mystery to the people, who
hold these views. They express a statement of the unknown framed in terms of
the known. They combine elements of personal experience with elements of the
collective speculative. They gain their meanings from how they help to explain
the unknown and uncertain. Archaeologically, we can imagine that the famous cave paintings of Chauvet-Pont-d'Arc Cave and Lascaux, and the early carvings
of the Earth Mother figurine are artifacts of storytelling. They demonstrate
through the ideational representations on the walls and crafted figurines the unrecorded words of the
story teller/teacher/priest. These artifacts maybe our first existential
evidence of the ideational domain of Human culture in the form of religion. Today, we can speculate about their meanings, an ideational act in itself.
Metaphorically, they are the tree that falls in the forest that we do hear.
The term “humanities” stands for a
classification for a wide range of scholarly disciplines that include history,
art, crafts, and religion. It represents a form of scholarship that emerged in Western Europe The common feature of these disciplines is their
focus and speculation about the human condition and social experience. They
evolved from the human existential experience filtered through the individual’s
mind and emotions. They are expressed through some manner of physical behavior a resulting physical act or structure. The important feature of the humanities is that
they are a shared experience. The sharing may be a temporary fad or become a
foundational belief or ritual practice incorporated into the culture.
The important part of a “humanity”
discipline is the relationship that it attempts to express between the
individual and the individual’s universe. It represents a structure into which
the creator of the experience can express his/her feelings. These individual
“feelings and insights” are converted by the individual into an ideational
representation. The creator, using his or her individual skills, attempts to
communicate their vision to others through his/her creation. The act of
expression comes from within, as an act of self-reflection.
Self- reflection involves a
conversation with one’s self. “What is this feeling that I have about this
experience?” “How can I express it?” The
importance of the ideational expression is in the creative process and not the
existential reality. It calls for playing with the available structural elements to create a
more interesting structure. That structure becomes an analogy of the experience. The creation
is the analogy that is shared with others. The individual's “purpose” is to find “meaning” in the experience.
“Meaning” is the function that humanistic structures create – “personal
meanings”, and “collective meanings”. Or, what we call, the “superorganic” or
“culture”.
Anthropology is the Humanity that
approaches its subject scientifically through the process of comparative
analysis of the observations of and participation in human activity and
experiencing its physical products. In this regard, the anthropologist
acknowledges the uncertainty of life. They also seek to understand life by
demonstrating how humans have and do attempt to take control of their
individual and collective lives. Humanists
and Anthropologist seek out the ways humans give “meaning” to the unknown and
their uncertainty about it.
As anthropology became more scientific in its methods and theories there has arisen a counter-movement, "humanistic anthropology" One element of this movement is something called "autoethnography" We will be discussing this method and approach in future articles here in the Superorganic Blogg.
No comments:
Post a Comment